← Back to Your Brief
The Breakdown
Olay · Rewrite The #SignsOfAgeing
Olay argued with the internet's own definition of ageing
Olay didn't just say ageing is good. It pointed at how search engines and AI answers describe 'signs of ageing', then used its own survey to argue that definition doesn't match what women actually feel.
4 min readOur analysis and study notes, not news reporting
The TL;DR (too long; didn't read)
- Olay launched 'Rewrite The #SignsOfAgeing' in Australia with Saatchi & Saatchi Singapore, arguing that online searches and AI-generated answers about ageing focus narrowly on wrinkles and sagging skin, and inviting Australian women to share via @olayau how they'd rewrite those signs to reflect confidence, resilience and experience instead.
- The campaign is built around a brand-commissioned YouGov Australia survey of 1,009 Australian women aged 30 to 60: 66% would decline the chance to be 20 years younger, 90% said ageing changed them for the better, yet 72% still linked ageing with wrinkles versus only 29% who linked it with confidence.
- The survey was commissioned and released by Olay to support its own campaign, and the campaign has only just launched, so there's no data yet on whether it changed how people search for or talk about ageing.
01
Picking a specific, nameable opponent
Rather than arguing against 'society's view of ageing' in the abstract, the campaign targets something concrete and checkable: what actually comes up when you search 'signs of ageing' or ask an AI chatbot about it.
That's a sharper target than a vague cultural critique, because anyone can go and search it themselves to see what Olay means.
Read the original reporting